Friday, April 10, 2015

Economic Review 1Q 2015

Nicholas Zaiko, CIMA®
Senior Consultant
Bridgebay Financial, Inc.
www.bridgebay.com



Global Central Banks
There are now 25 central banks that have eased, added substantial stimulus to their economies and lowered their target interest rates comparable to the Fed Funds rates.  Central bank support means international bond yields are likely to remain low, while they appear poised to rise in the U.S.  All of these accommodative efforts are designed to combat deflation but have also driven up the value of USD.  Diverging central bank monetary policies and political risk in Europe will lead to increased volatility in equities, fixed income and currencies.

Federal Reserve
The FOMC March 17-18, 2015 meeting minutes indicated differences as to the timing of rate hikes and the prevailing economic conditions.  Although some Fed members favored a June rate hike,   September-December is now expected with gradual increases to follow.  The Fed is focused on trade, economic growth, the strength of the USD and the effects of lower energy prices.  The Fed is monitoring the strong USD and its potential drag on exports and overall growth.

The Fed is positive about the underlying consumer spending over the medium-term, improvement in jobs, the wealth effect from improved house and stock valuations, stronger consumer balance sheets, lower energy prices and higher consumer confidence.  The Fed is tracking payroll gains, labor market slack with less emphasis on wage growth. 
Interest Rate Hikes

The FOMC lowered their interest rate forecast by 50 bps in 2015.  FOMC consensus now signals a September hike, followed by 100-125 bps of rate hikes in 2016.  The Fed lowered its forecasts and now expects growth to be 2.3-2.7% and core inflation to be 1.3-1.4% in 2015, below its 2% target. 

The USD has appreciated by 7% since December and 20% against global currencies over the last 6 months.  The Fed’s model indicates that a 10% increase in the USD reduces US growth by 0.7%, reduces core inflation by 0.4% and applies pressure to keep Fed Funds rate lower for longer.  

Banking Sector
Moody’s announced their updated bank rating methodology that incorporates several solvency and liquidity factors.  Their intent is to predict bank failures and determine how each creditor class may be treated when a bank fails.  The new methodology will focus on an enhanced Financial Profile which encompasses five solvency and liquidity-related financial ratios that are predictive of bank failures:


  1. Asset Risk
  2. Capital
  3. Profitability
  4. Funding structure
  5. Liquid resources


This new approach reflects insights gained from the global financial crisis and the fundamental shift in the banking industry and its regulation.

European banks located in the EU, Norway and Switzerland, whose government support has been partially removed will be impacted by 3 ratings notches.  The effect of the new methodology takes a loss given failure approach and gives credit for available layers of subordinated liability when assigning ratings to senior debt.  This approach changes the focus from sovereign ratings to name-specific and quality of bank capitalization. 

Moody’s already implemented their ratings changes on US Banks when it removed its assumptions for government support.  Some holding companies of UK banks were negatively impacted by the (BRRD) Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive.  Canadian, Australian and Japanese banks were not affected by Moody’s methodology changes.

Fixed Income Markets
The search for yield and pension fund de-risking should flatten yield curves throughout 2015.  The market expects the Treasury curve to flatten and the dollar to continue to strengthen, but credit markets could see some temporary spread widening.

There may be a modest rise in Treasury yields along with some flattening of the yield curve as short-term rates rise more than long-term rates. The USD may continue to strengthen as monetary policy diverges between the U.S., Europe and Japan and credit spreads may initially widen.

The recent weakness in the U.S. data is partly weather-related and may have been influenced by the port shutdowns on the West Coast given the impact on the regional manufacturing surveys. At the present time, the Fed expects to increase interest rates by an average of one percentage point per year through 2017.

Such a gradual pace of rate hikes is not likely to derail the economic expansion nor should it have a lasting impact on risk assets.  As the Fed prepares to raise interest rates, it is expected to keep its target interest rate within a narrow band.  The top of the band will be the interest on excess reserves (IOER), which is the interest the Fed pays banks for the money they have on deposit at the central bank. This rate is currently set at 25 basis points (bps) and seems likely to rise to 50bps with the Fed’s first rate increase.  The lower end of the band will be the interest the Fed pays money market funds and other nonbank institutions for cash not on deposit at banks (overnight reverse-repo rate).  

The Fed’s projections show the long-term equilibrium Fed Funds rate may be 3.5% which is still historically low. 


Saturday, March 14, 2015

Education Policy Statement

Nicholas Zaiko, CIMA®
Investment Consultant
Bridgebay Financial, Inc.

Plan sponsors understand the importance of managing a well-designed retirement plan for their employees.  As deferral rates increase and automatic plan features help encourage savings in defined contribution plans it becomes increasingly important to have a financially literate workforce.  Education is a critical element in ensuring that employees have a good understanding of their benefits.  Employees place their trust in their employer to provide for their best interests.  Education designed to help the employer’s workforce achieve financial stability through retirement savings and sound financial practices is universally well received and appreciated by employees. 

As a plan sponsor, the decision to implement and maintain an education program for employees is integral to pursuing a prudent process and is just as important as selecting the investment options for the defined contribution plan.  Effective employee communication enhances the participants’ awareness of the retirement plan’s features and guides participants to create their own retirement savings portfolios and implement appropriate savings strategies.

Once a formalized education program has been established, participants tend to express greater confidence in their ability to save for their future.  A transparent and well-communicated retirement plan strategy engages participants and forges a partnership in the savings process. 

Education should be targeted to the level of understanding of the employees and participants in the plan.  There may be different levels of understanding, personal circumstances, savings rates and stages in life.  All of these differences may require multi-pronged education programs that address the participants’ unique needs.  Employee surveys and targeted communications are instrumental in optimizing the educational process to achieve positive results.

Education Policy Statement
Most plan sponsors provide a basic level of education for their participants.  Developing an Education Policy Statement documents the employer’s commitment to provide financial education to participants by establishing a framework for a well-structured and communicated program.    Crafting this document provides direction and procedural guidelines for key members of the plan sponsor staff to make decisions regarding the content and implementation of the education program.

The plan sponsor’s approach can be very paternalistic and highly protective of the employees’ best interest in providing for financial literacy and personal finance beyond the requirements of the retirement plan.  Some plan sponsors may play a more limited role that is specific to communicating the elements of the retirement plan to its participants. 

The objectives of the education plan may be to enhance employee engagement, encourage better savings, promote financial wellness and improve employee retention and loyalty.

Benefits of an Education Policy Statement
An Education Policy codifies the plan sponsor’s educational aspirations and documents their commitment to employee education by establishing goals and objectives that can be implemented and measured.  Feedback is typically very positive after the implementation of a well-directed, focused educational program for employees.  Many participants claim to feel more confident in making sound and informed decisions. 

A clearly articulated strategic education plan focuses important resources to optimize budgets and time. Policy statements help plan sponsors and fiduciaries define and document their ongoing efforts in designating resources to help participants understand their choices.  An added benefit for plan sponsors and fiduciaries is that the policy helps document a prudent process.

A well-developed policy identifies goals and highlights responsibilities for implementing, deploying, and measuring results.  Accountability increases the co-operation among different groups involved in providing education to meet the established goals.   

Features of an Education Policy Statement
A policy sets the overall direction of the program and establishes procedures for ongoing education, feedback and communications.  It addresses the overall objectives of the education program, establishes the plan sponsor’s philosophical approach and mission statement.  The purpose of the Education Policy should be to retain employees and enhance their loyalty by offering ongoing investment education.

The policy should define roles, responsibilities, and accountability for the program’s success.  Often this includes the plan sponsor, plan fiduciary advisor, recordkeeper, and education service provider. The roles and responsibilities throughout the planning process, implementation and monitoring the effectiveness of the education program should be outlined.

The due diligence process for the selection of third-party service providers can be identified as well as criteria for the selection of education service providers, potential conflicts of interest, and monitoring their effectiveness.  Criteria for education service providers should be set for the selection, evaluation and ongoing monitoring of educational results.

Setting metrics and milestones provide prudent guidance. The use of participant data and plan metrics can be used to monitor and evaluate success.  Timelines for measuring results, frequency and other general types of metrics can be valuable tools.

Conclusion
A financially educated workforce is another tool plan sponsors can use to encourage and cultivate success for both their retirement plan and their plan participants.  A structured and well-articulated education plan, documented by an Education Policy Statement, can serve to provide fiduciary protection, improve participant loyalty and foster successful savings habits.