Wednesday, October 30, 2013

An Evaluation of Target-Date Funds for 401(k) Plan

Presented at the Association for Financial Professionals (AFP) National Conference in Las Vegas, NV

Presented by:

Randy Murphy
Senior Manager, Equity Compensation, Inc.

Linda Ruiz-Zaiko

Target-date funds (TDFs) are the most popular QDIA and have become one of the largest plan investment options for DC plans. As a fiduciary, plan sponsors should have a selection and monitoring discipline for TDFs in place. Panelists discuss how the plan sponsor conducted a detailed evaluation of their plan’s current target-date fund suite and conducted a search to make a side-by-side analysis of those funds. TDFs were reviewed for asset allocation, performance and fees.

Saturday, August 10, 2013

403(b) Plans Can Follow the 401(k) Plan (ERISA) Model

Nicholas Zaiko
Investment Consultant
Bridgebay Financial, Inc.

Defined Contribution Plans Converge
In many respects a 403(b) plan is very similar to a 401(k) plan.  They both provide tax advantaged savings vehicles for employees, the major difference being the groups of employees.  403(b) plans are specifically designed for the employees of nonprofit organizations while 401(k) plans apply to employees of for-profit organizations.  Another major difference has been the level of regulation imposed on these two types of plans.  That difference however, is shrinking as recent IRS regulations have been pushing 403(b) sponsors to streamline administrative functions and take a more active fiduciary role in their plan.  A recent survey conducted by the Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA) revealed that the number of non-ERISA compliant 403(b) plans is shrinking as plan sponsors adopt ERISA compliance, in light of increased regulation.

Plan Enhancements
403(b) plan sponsors are realizing that a multi-provider, open-ended plan may not be the best type of arrangement for their participants.  While many believed this type of open arrangement absolved the sponsor of fiduciary responsibility, it is now clear that regulators do not believe that participants should be left to fend for themselves.  A 403(b) plan with multiple service providers has no consistency of message, education or investment products.  The IRS and DoL requirements on 403(b) plan sponsors, similar to those that have existed in the 401(k) market for years, provide an integrated retirement plan.   

Fortunately, 403(b) retirement plan sponsors have the ERISA-covered 401(k) plan model to help them comply with ERISA regulations and emulate the best practices and plan features in the 401(k) market.  Some of these enhancements include automatic enrollment, refining the core fund menu, consolidating service providers and improving and unifying the participant education and communication programs.

Fiduciary Responsibility
Evolving 403(b) regulations have required reporting on a plan basis and compelled 403(b) plan sponsors to take on more responsibility as fiduciaries of the plan.  As fiduciaries, employers may retain a retirement plan advisor as co-fiduciary to provide independent advice on the selection of plan providers, operation of the plan, participant education and investments available to participants.   An independent advisor assists the fiduciaries in implementing best practices and developing a prudent due diligence process in overseeing the plan. As in the 401(k) market, the employer negotiates with the plan sponsor on behalf of the participants, minimizing the potential for unsophisticated individuals to be taken advantage of by opaque and costly arrangements.  ERISA compliance also provides that the DoL and IRS with additional authority to oversee 403(b) plans.  The regulators want to see plan sponsors taking a much more active role in monitoring and overseeing the plan.

This additional oversight is similar to the requirements of a 401(k) plan and so an easy way to achieve this level of compliance is simply to establish the same type of due diligence process which is common in the 401(k) plan environment.  The solutions and best practices already exist so 403(b) plan sponsors can source the experience and knowledge of experts in the 401(k) industry and apply best practices to their 403(b) plan. 

Proper Documentation
Many plan sponsors successfully met the December 31, 2009 deadline to draft, approve and adopt a written 403(b) plan document.  This however, is only part of the requirement.  The IRS is also looking to see that the plan is in fact being operated in accordance with the plan document.  As part of their audit, the IRS may seek information from the payroll and human resources department to validate the operation of the plan.  Deviations from the stated plan document could highlight deficiencies with either the plan document or the plan administration.  As part of an annual review, be sure you can produce the 403(b) plan document and that it is consistent with the day-to-day operations of the plan.  Additionally, ensure that the plan document is consistent with the summary plan document (SPD) which is given to the plan participants.  

Focusing on Participants
Many 403(b) plans that have successfully transitioned to ERISA compliance now find themselves in the enviable position of refocusing energy away from compliance and on to participant outcomes.   

Plan sponsors are increasingly adding plan options such as target-date, target-risk and other investment vehicles designed to increase their participants' chances of reaching their retirement goals.  Administrative enhancements achieved by consolidating providers and streamlining operations free up valuable internal resources that can then be redeployed to enhance plan participation and participant education.

Though the challenges of bringing your 403(b) plan up to ERISA standards may seem imposing, take comfort in the knowledge that the solutions already exist and that once the transition has been completed, maintaining a properly documented due diligence process will yield numerous benefits to both the plan sponsor and the participants.  The most obvious benefits include reduced plan costs, enhanced participation, improved participant education and streamlined plan administration.